High availability engineering eliminates single points of failure so that systems remain accessible even when individual components fail.
Why it matters
- Modern businesses depend on 24/7 system availability.
- Downtime costs range from thousands to millions per hour.
- SLAs often require 99.9% or higher uptime guarantees.
- Customer experience suffers from even brief outages.
The "nines" of availability
- 99% (two nines): 3.65 days downtime/year
- 99.9% (three nines): 8.76 hours downtime/year
- 99.99% (four nines): 52.6 minutes downtime/year
- 99.999% (five nines): 5.26 minutes downtime/year
- 99.9999% (six nines): 31.5 seconds downtime/year
HA design principles
- Redundancy: Duplicate critical components (servers, storage, network paths).
- Failover: Automatic switching to standby systems when primary fails.
- Load balancing: Distribute traffic across multiple instances.
- Geographic distribution: Spread across data centers/regions.
- Health monitoring: Detect failures quickly to trigger failover.
Common HA patterns
- Active-passive: Standby takes over only when primary fails.
- Active-active: All nodes serve traffic simultaneously.
- N+1 redundancy: One extra instance beyond minimum required.
- 2N redundancy: Double the required capacity.
Implementation considerations
- Database replication and clustering.
- Stateless application design for easy scaling.
- Session management across instances.
- DNS failover or global load balancing.
- Chaos engineering to test failure scenarios.
- Monitoring and alerting for rapid incident response.
Trade-offs
- Higher complexity and operational overhead.
- Increased infrastructure costs.
- Potential for split-brain scenarios in distributed systems.
- Need for thorough testing of failover mechanisms.
Related Articles
View all articlesMDR Vendor Performance Benchmarks: The Metrics That Matter
Only a handful of MDR providers publish detection and response time benchmarks. We compiled every publicly citable metric from CrowdStrike, Expel, Huntress, eSentire, Arctic Wolf, Red Canary, and Microsoft to help you compare vendors on data, not marketing.
Read article →CrowdStrike vs Expel: MDR Detection Speed Comparison
CrowdStrike and Expel are two of the only MDR providers that publish both detection and response time benchmarks. Expel is faster on MTTR (13 min vs 37 min). CrowdStrike has MITRE validation.
Read article →CrowdStrike vs SentinelOne: Endpoint Security and MITRE ATT&CK Compared
Both CrowdStrike and SentinelOne deliver strong MITRE ATT&CK detection results. The key difference: CrowdStrike is the only vendor with MITRE Managed Services evaluation.
Read article →AES vs Classical Ciphers: Why Modern Encryption Actually Works
Understand why AES is unbreakable while Caesar cipher fails instantly. Learn the fundamental differences between classical and modern encryption, and why proper cryptography matters for real security.
Read article →